NAME

PXB: Perl XML data Binding

AUTHOR

         Maxim Grigoriev
	 

CONTENTS

"INTRODUCTION"
"PXB FRAMEWORK"
"DATA MODEL"
"API CLASS INTROSPECTION"
"CASE STUDY"
" Utilizing PXB for perfSONAR-PS web services"
"perfSONAR-PS data model for PingER service"
"SQL MAPPING"
"REFERENCES"

INTRODUCTION

This document presents and describes API designed for binding  RelaxNG (Compact) 
or XML schema, represented by RelaxNG Compact notation into the perl class library. 
The main idea behind such binding is to
provide flexible and scalable API which will allow developers  of the document
literal based web services easily describe any service messaging profile by writing
simple  perl data structures.   This approach allows you to work with data
from any  XML message using your own class structures, so your XML elements are binded into the
perl objects, therefore it called Perl XML data Binding (or PXB). 
The PXB framework will handle all the
details of converting  data to and from XML or DOM objects based on your
instructions. The DOM objects tree is created by utilizing very fast LibXML library. 
PXB was designed to allow you a high degree of control over the
translation process with custom callbacks and SQL mapping of the hierarchical
XML entities into the  flat  SQL database schema.
Even more importantly to note that PXB creates heavily documented, highly supportable and
maintainable perl class hierarchies. It also automatically creates test  suit for every created class.
The Perl::Tidy and Perl::Critic profile files are provided in the doc directory to assure compliance
with the Best Perl Practices.
If you familiar with java XML dat abinding packages such L</xmlbeans>, L</CASTOR>, L</METRO> or older L</JAXB> 
then idea of unmarshalling XML into the simple objects should be  known to you. 

PXB FRAMEWORK

or Why Yet Another XML framework

 PXB uses the power of perl data structures to define the rules of how perl
objects are converted to or from XML (the binding).  Or more explicitly to and
from the DOM tree objects. Why not to use  DOM instead ?  DOM is just a
representation of the XML tree data structure. It does not provide any facility  to
hook up easily some custom callback aligned with some external data schema to
the particular element in the tree.  The current spectrum of available XML APIs
for perl is limited to tree walking and XPath based search.  
 Also, the process of refactoring heavy XML driven perl code based on
XML/XPath approach was found to be very tedious and  error prone. 
Especially when schemas are constantly adapting to the ever changing customer's requirements.
 The PXB framework is an attempt to bring configurable callbacks into the DOM 
and add some functional validation inside of such binding as well as provide
mechanism to map  SQL database schema to the hierarchical structure of the DOM tree.
Importance of such mapping technique was exposed by the lack of robust support for native  XML data
type among the current  list of “freeware” storage engines where the  SQL RDBM
is more or less a standard and performance of the native XML databases are still far 
from the optimal. Also, PXB uses perl as meta-language and it uses
perl to create perl OO API which makes schema's code significantly smaller.  
Any developer can concentrate on implementing semantic rules, protocols and actual 
functionality instead of wasting any time on reimplementing once again  XML tree walking API.  
 Moreover, there is an automated test suite for the each class of the generated API   and
every method call is documented. The internal structure of  every class was designed  
to be  clean, readable and easily understandable by any other perl developer. 
It utilizes  perl’ best practices [2] and uses  L<fields> packages to provide tighter
encapsulation and creates explicitly named lists of accessors and
mutators. Behavioral semantic of the each class in the class tree is the same
and implements absolutely the same methods to allow transparency and 
propagation of the implemented callbacks across the API. 

DATA MODEL

The basic XML element definition is represented as perl hash reference:

Where each <xxxx-definition> can be expressed in EBNF[3] as

elements => [parameter => [$parameter]] - defines list of ‘‘parameter’ sub-elements
elements => [parameter => $parameter] - defines single ‘parameter’ sub-element
elements => [parameters => [$parameters,$select_parameters]] - defines choice between two single ‘parameters’ sub-elements of different type
elements => [datum => [[$pinger_datum], [$result_datum]] ] - defines choice between two lists of ‘‘datum’ sub-elements of different type

In elements-definition the third member is an optional conditional statement which represents validation rule. For example ‘unless:value’ conditional statement will be translated into the perl’ conditional statement && !($self-get_value)> where ‘value’ must be registered attribute or sub-element name and this condition will be placed in every piece of code where perl object is serialized into the XML DOM object or unmarshalled from it.

API CLASS INTROSPECTION

In order to provide the same class interface throughout the API, the same universal constructors and same set of method calls were implemented. Currently the constructor body includes initialization part as well and this part is slightly different for different modules, but it might be reduced to generic constructor and some custom initialization part in the future where generic constructor might be inherited from some sort of the base Object class. Currently every constructor “knows” how to initialize the whole class from the DOM object, XML string fragment or from the reference to the perl hash structure of the named class fields. Also, it “knows” how to handle arrays of the class fields with support for elements identified by id. It supports special field, named idmap for that purpose. It “knows” how to serialize object of the class into the DOM or XML text string and how to map contents of the object on some SQL schema. By issuing registerNamespaces call to the root object one can obtain the reference to the hash with all namespaces utilized by every sub-element in the object. It utilizes another special field, called nsmap for that. This field is an object of the generated helper class and serves as container for map between local names and namespace prefixes. Every namespace is identified by namespace prefix and the version of the schema is getting built into the generated API package pathname.

CASE STUDY

Our case is based on building interoperable SOAP document/literal based webservice for perfSONAR-PS project. Webservices are indeed wrappers around network performance monitoring tools. Where there are two types of services - Measuremnt Archive (MA) with ability to publish historical data and Measurement Point (MP) providing on-demand measurements.

Utilizing PXB for perfSONAR-PS web services

The major utilization scenario of the PXB framework comes when there is a need to build MA service with SQL database based storage engine. In any case PXB framework will provide the complete solution and actual development for MP will be contained in writing real time measurements facility class and then utilizing PXB to inject measured data into the published XML message. For MA the whole SD process will be dedicated to writing the actual message handler and implementing actual protocol specifications. For example, for PingER MA it is perfSONAR_PS::Datatypes::PingER class, inherited from perfSONAR_PS::Datatypes::Message class with actual implementation of SetupData request and MetaDataKey request handlers. The perfSONAR_PS::Datatypes::Message is an abstract class, extending perfSONAR_PS::Datatypes::v2_0::nmwg::Message class. This extra class exists because the root Message class from the PXB is message type agnostic.

perfSONAR-PS data model for PingER service

The root of the perfSONAR-PS schema and the root of the OO API built by PXB is the Message object. It exists in the perfSONAR base namespace identified by nmwg id. The schema is versioned. The most current root package name for Message class is perfSONAR_PS::Datatypes::v2_0::nmwg::Message. The base schema is completely defined by perfSONAR_PS::DataModels::DataModel module. This is a simple perl package and not the class, because it has only data definitions. The current DataModel has implemented definitions from several OGF schemas, namely: filter.rnc, nmtopo.rnc, nmbase.rnc, nmtm.rnc, nmtl3.rnc, nmtl4.rnc. There is no SQL mapping definitions in the base data model allowed, because SQL mapping is a service specific. Any service specific extension of this base schema must be extended in the separate data model package as it was done for PingER service. The PingER data model can be viewed as an example and it is contained in the perfSONAR_PS::DataModels::PingER_Model. Any other extension data model package can be created for any other service. Let’s look on example of the parameter element. It is described in the base model as:

That means the parameter element has name and value attributes, does not have any sub-elements and might have optional (only when value attribute is undefined) text content. For PingER service it was extended as:

Where explicit enumeration was added for the list of allowed values of the name attribute and SQL mapping was defined as:

Please note that time table name was made up to allow mapping of the time range related entities. Also, tlimit table name was made up to provide non-existed paging mechanism in order to limit the size of the requested dataset in the response message. As it clear from the example above, the schema can be modified in any time without affecting the rest of the service API. For example extra attribute ‘named type’ can be added and the whole API framework rebuild in the matter of seconds. Then developer can utilize this extra attribute type by calling ->get_type on the parameter object in the message handling class and new functionality will be immediately supported.

SQL MAPPING

Lets look again on the example of the SQL mapping definitions for PingER service from previous chapter. Every object of the API class tree implements querySQL call. It accepts reference to the empty hash and passes this reference through the whole objects tree while filling contents of the hash with initialized contents of the “objects of interest”. The “object of interest” is defined by the SQL mapping definition. For example, for definition:

for Parameter object with name attribute set to ‘count’ and ‘value attribute’ or text content set to ‘100’ it will add:

metaData = {‘count’ => { ‘eq’ => ‘100’}}>

into the SQL query hash. The resulted hash for metaData table will be returned and will look as:

where it can be easily passed to any of SQL ORM frameworks in order to build proper WHERE clause. For example Class::DBI or with minor refactoring to the Rose::DB

REFERENCES

1. RelaxNG Compact - http://relaxng.org/compact-tutorial-20030326.html
2 xmlbeans , http://xmlbeans.apache.org
3 METRO, http://java.sun.com/webservices/index.jsp
4 CASTOR, http://www.castor.org/
5 JAXB, http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/WebServices/jaxb/
6 Perl Best Practices, by Damian Conway
7 EBNF - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_Backus%E2%80%93Naur_form
8 perfSONAR-PS - https://wiki.internet2.edu/confluence/display/PSPS

1 POD Error

The following errors were encountered while parsing the POD:

Around line 85:

Non-ASCII character seen before =encoding in '“freeware”'. Assuming CP1252