NAME
Moose - A complete modern object system for Perl 5
SYNOPSIS
package Point;
use Moose; # automatically turns on strict and warnings
has 'x' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Int');
has 'y' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Int');
sub clear {
my $self = shift;
$self->x(0);
$self->y(0);
}
package Point3D;
use Moose;
extends 'Point';
has 'z' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Int');
after 'clear' => sub {
my $self = shift;
$self->z(0);
};
DESCRIPTION
Moose is an extension of the Perl 5 object system.
Another object system!?!?
Yes, I know there has been an explosion recently of new ways to build object's in Perl 5, most of them based on inside-out objects and other such things. Moose is different because it is not a new object system for Perl 5, but instead an extension of the existing object system.
Moose is built on top of Class::MOP, which is a metaclass system for Perl 5. This means that Moose not only makes building normal Perl 5 objects better, but it also provides the power of metaclass programming.
Is this for real? Or is this just an experiment?
Moose is based on the prototypes and experiments I did for the Perl 6 meta-model. However, Moose is NOT an experiment/prototype; it is for real.
Is this ready for use in production?
Yes, I believe that it is.
I have two medium-to-large-ish web applications which use Moose heavily and have been in production (without issue) for several months now. At $work, we are re-writing our core offering in it. And several people on #moose have been using it (in production) for several months now as well.
Of course, in the end, you need to make this call yourself. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to email me, or even the list or just stop by #moose and ask away.
Is Moose just Perl 6 in Perl 5?
No. While Moose is very much inspired by Perl 6, it is not itself Perl 6. Instead, it is an OO system for Perl 5. I built Moose because I was tired of writing the same old boring Perl 5 OO code, and drooling over Perl 6 OO. So instead of switching to Ruby, I wrote Moose :)
BUILDING CLASSES WITH MOOSE
Moose makes every attempt to provide as much convenience as possible during class construction/definition, but still stay out of your way if you want it to. Here are a few items to note when building classes with Moose.
Unless specified with extends
, any class which uses Moose will inherit from Moose::Object.
Moose will also manage all attributes (including inherited ones) that are defined with has
. And (assuming you call new
, which is inherited from Moose::Object) this includes properly initializing all instance slots, setting defaults where appropriate, and performing any type constraint checking or coercion.
EXPORTED FUNCTIONS
Moose will export a number of functions into the class's namespace which may then be used to set up the class. These functions all work directly on the current class.
- meta
-
This is a method which provides access to the current class's metaclass.
- extends (@superclasses)
-
This function will set the superclass(es) for the current class.
This approach is recommended instead of
use base
, becauseuse base
actuallypush
es onto the class's@ISA
, whereasextends
will replace it. This is important to ensure that classes which do not have superclasses still properly inherit from Moose::Object. - with (@roles)
-
This will apply a given set of
@roles
to the local class. Role support is currently under heavy development; see Moose::Role for more details. - has $name => %options
-
This will install an attribute of a given
$name
into the current class. The%options
are the same as those provided by Class::MOP::Attribute, in addition to the list below which are provided by Moose (Moose::Meta::Attribute to be more specific):- is => 'rw'|'ro'
-
The is option accepts either rw (for read/write) or ro (for read only). These will create either a read/write accessor or a read-only accessor respectively, using the same name as the
$name
of the attribute.If you need more control over how your accessors are named, you can use the reader, writer and accessor options inherited from Class::MOP::Attribute.
- isa => $type_name
-
The isa option uses Moose's type constraint facilities to set up runtime type checking for this attribute. Moose will perform the checks during class construction, and within any accessors. The
$type_name
argument must be a string. The string may be either a class name or a type defined using Moose's type definition features. - coerce => (1|0)
-
This will attempt to use coercion with the supplied type constraint to change the value passed into any accessors or constructors. You must have supplied a type constraint in order for this to work. See Moose::Cookbook::Recipe5 for an example.
- does => $role_name
-
This will accept the name of a role which the value stored in this attribute is expected to have consumed.
- required => (1|0)
-
This marks the attribute as being required. This means a value must be supplied during class construction, and the attribute may never be set to
undef
with an accessor. - weak_ref => (1|0)
-
This will tell the class to store the value of this attribute as a weakened reference. If an attribute is a weakened reference, it cannot also be coerced.
- lazy => (1|0)
-
This will tell the class to not create this slot until absolutely necessary. If an attribute is marked as lazy it must have a default supplied.
- auto_deref => (1|0)
-
This tells the accessor whether to automatically dereference the value returned. This is only legal if your
isa
option is eitherArrayRef
orHashRef
. - metaclass => $metaclass_name
-
This tells the class to use a custom attribute metaclass for this particular attribute. Custom attribute metaclasses are useful for extending the capabilities of the has keyword: they are the simplest way to extend the MOP, but they are still a fairly advanced topic and too much to cover here. I will try and write a recipe on them soon.
The default behavior here is to just load
$metaclass_name
; however, we also have a way to alias to a shorter name. This will first look to see if Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::$metaclass_name exists. If it does, Moose will then check to see if that has the methodregister_implemenetation
, which should return the actual name of the custom attribute metaclass. If there is noregister_implemenetation
method, it will fall back to using Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::$metaclass_name as the metaclass name. - trigger => $code
-
The trigger option is a CODE reference which will be called after the value of the attribute is set. The CODE ref will be passed the instance itself, the updated value and the attribute meta-object (this is for more advanced fiddling and can typically be ignored). You cannot have a trigger on a read-only attribute.
- handles => ARRAY | HASH | REGEXP | CODE
-
The handles option provides Moose classes with automated delegation features. This is a pretty complex and powerful option. It accepts many different option formats, each with its own benefits and drawbacks.
NOTE: This feature is no longer experimental, but it may still have subtle bugs lurking in the deeper corners. If you think you have found a bug, you probably have, so please report it to me right away.
NOTE: The class being delegated to does not need to be a Moose based class, which is why this feature is especially useful when wrapping non-Moose classes.
All handles option formats share the following traits:
You cannot override a locally defined method with a delegated method; an exception will be thrown if you try. That is to say, if you define
foo
in your class, you cannot override it with a delegatedfoo
. This is almost never something you would want to do, and if it is, you should do it by hand and not use Moose.You cannot override any of the methods found in Moose::Object, or the
BUILD
andDEMOLISH
methods. These will not throw an exception, but will silently move on to the next method in the list. My reasoning for this is that you would almost never want to do this, since it usually breaks your class. As with overriding locally defined methods, if you do want to do this, you should do it manually, not with Moose.Below is the documentation for each option format:
ARRAY
-
This is the most common usage for handles. You basically pass a list of method names to be delegated, and Moose will install a delegation method for each one.
HASH
-
This is the second most common usage for handles. Instead of a list of method names, you pass a HASH ref where each key is the method name you want installed locally, and its value is the name of the original method in the class being delegated to.
This can be very useful for recursive classes like trees. Here is a quick example (soon to be expanded into a Moose::Cookbook::Recipe):
package Tree; use Moose; has 'node' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Any'); has 'children' => ( is => 'ro', isa => 'ArrayRef', default => sub { [] } ); has 'parent' => ( is => 'rw', isa => 'Tree', is_weak_ref => 1, handles => { parent_node => 'node', siblings => 'children', } );
In this example, the Tree package gets
parent_node
andsiblings
methods, which delegate to thenode
andchildren
methods (respectively) of the Tree instance stored in theparent
slot. REGEXP
-
The regexp option works very similar to the ARRAY option, except that it builds the list of methods for you. It starts by collecting all possible methods of the class being delegated to, then filters that list using the regexp supplied here.
NOTE: An isa option is required when using the regexp option format. This is so that we can determine (at compile time) the method list from the class. Without an isa this is just not possible.
CODE
-
This is the option to use when you really want to do something funky. You should only use it if you really know what you are doing, as it involves manual metaclass twiddling.
This takes a code reference, which should expect two arguments. The first is the attribute meta-object this handles is attached to. The second is the metaclass of the class being delegated to. It expects you to return a hash (not a HASH ref) of the methods you want mapped.
- has +$name => %options
-
This is variation on the normal attibute creator
has
which allows you to clone and extend an attribute from a superclass. Here is a quick example:package Foo; use Moose; has 'message' => ( is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', default => 'Hello, I am a Foo' ); package My::Foo; use Moose; extends 'Foo'; has '+message' => (default => 'Hello I am My::Foo');
What is happening here is that My::Foo is cloning the
message
attribute from its parent class Foo, retaining theis => 'rw'
andisa => 'Str'
characteristics, but changing the value indefault
.This feature is restricted somewhat, so as to try and enfore at least some sanity into it. You are only allowed to change the following attributes:
- default
-
Change the default value of an attribute.
- coerce
-
Change whether the attribute attempts to coerce a value passed to it.
- required
-
Change if the attribute is required to have a value.
- documentation
-
Change the documentation string associated with the attribute.
- isa
-
You are allowed to change the type, if and only if the new type is a subtype of the old type.
- before $name|@names => sub { ... }
- after $name|@names => sub { ... }
- around $name|@names => sub { ... }
-
This three items are syntactic sugar for the before, after, and around method modifier features that Class::MOP provides. More information on these may be found in the Class::MOP::Class documentation for now.
- super
-
The keyword
super
is a no-op when called outside of anoverride
method. In the context of anoverride
method, it will call the next most appropriate superclass method with the same arguments as the original method. - override ($name, &sub)
-
An
override
method is a way of explicitly saying "I am overriding this method from my superclass". You can callsuper
within this method, and it will work as expected. The same thing can be accomplished with a normal method call and theSUPER::
pseudo-package; it is really your choice. - inner
-
The keyword
inner
, much likesuper
, is a no-op outside of the context of anaugment
method. You can think ofinner
as being the inverse ofsuper
; the details of howinner
andaugment
work is best described in the Moose::Cookbook. - augment ($name, &sub)
-
An
augment
method, is a way of explicitly saying "I am augmenting this method from my superclass". Once again, the details of howinner
andaugment
work is best described in the Moose::Cookbook. - confess
-
This is the
Carp::confess
function, and exported here because I use it all the time. This feature may change in the future, so you have been warned. - blessed
-
This is the
Scalar::Util::blessed
function, it is exported here because I use it all the time. It is highly recommended that this is used instead ofref
anywhere you need to test for an object's class name.
UNIMPORTING FUNCTIONS
unimport
Moose offers a way to remove the keywords it exports, through the unimport
method. You simply have to say no Moose
at the bottom of your code for this to work. Here is an example:
package Person;
use Moose;
has 'first_name' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str');
has 'last_name' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str');
sub full_name {
my $self = shift;
$self->first_name . ' ' . $self->last_name
}
no Moose; # keywords are removed from the Person package
MISC.
What does Moose stand for??
Moose doesn't stand for one thing in particular. However, if you want, here are a few of my favorites; feel free to contribute more :)
- Make Other Object Systems Envious
- Makes Object Orientation So Easy
- Makes Object Orientation Spiffy- Er (sorry ingy)
- Most Other Object Systems Emasculate
- Moose Often Ovulate Sorta Early
- Moose Offers Often Super Extensions
- Meta Object Orientation Syntax Extensions
CAVEATS
It should be noted that
super
andinner
cannot be used in the same method. However, they may be combined within the same class hierarchy; see t/014_override_augment_inner_super.t for an example.The reason for this is that
super
is only valid within a method with theoverride
modifier, andinner
will never be valid within anoverride
method. In fact,augment
will skip over anyoverride
methods when searching for its appropriateinner
.This might seem like a restriction, but I am of the opinion that keeping these two features separate (yet interoperable) actually makes them easy to use, since their behavior is then easier to predict. Time will tell whether I am right or not.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
- I blame Sam Vilain for introducing me to the insanity that is meta-models.
- I blame Audrey Tang for then encouraging my meta-model habit in #perl6.
- Without Yuval "nothingmuch" Kogman this module would not be possible, and it certainly wouldn't have this name ;P
- The basis of the TypeContraints module was Rob Kinyon's idea originally, I just ran with it.
- Thanks to mst & chansen and the whole #moose poose for all the ideas/feature-requests/encouragement/bug-finding.
- Thanks to David "Theory" Wheeler for meta-discussions and spelling fixes.
SEE ALSO
- Class::MOP documentation
- The #moose channel on irc.perl.org
- The Moose mailing list - moose@perl.org
- http://forum2.org/moose/
- http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/publications/oopsla04-gff.pdf
-
This paper (suggested by lbr on #moose) was what lead to the implementation of the
super
/override
andinner
/augment
features. If you really want to understand them, I suggest you read this.
BUGS
All complex software has bugs lurking in it, and this module is no exception. If you find a bug please either email me, or add the bug to cpan-RT.
AUTHOR
Stevan Little <stevan@iinteractive.com>
with contributions from:
Aankhen
Adam (Alias) Kennedy
Anders (Debolaz) Nor Berle
Christian (chansen) Hansen
Eric (ewilhelm) Wilhelm
Guillermo (groditi) Roditi
Jess (castaway) Robinson
Matt (mst) Trout
Robert (phaylon) Sedlacek
Robert (rlb3) Boone
Scott (konobi) McWhirter
Yuval (nothingmuch) Kogman
Chris (perigrin) Prather
... and many other #moose folks
COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
Copyright 2006, 2007 by Infinity Interactive, Inc.
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.